“Election Day” has become a fuzzy concept lately. Officially it falls on “the Tuesday next after the first Monday in the month of November.” However, most states offer early voting in person or by mail these days.
Millions of Americans have already cast their votes. The probability that we won’t know all the winners and losers on “election night” is in the neighborhood of 100%. The U.S. Senate race in Georgia may well go to a runoff. Some Congressional races may come out close enough to justify a recount. In other races, prospective sore losers have already announced their intention to litigate any result they don’t like.
Even though I’m writing this on the Saturday before “Election Day,” there’s a good chance you won’t see it until Wednesday or later. So now feels like as good a time as any for the “morning after” column.
So, how was it for you? Are you basking in the afterglow of “your team’s” victories, or venting loudly about the unfairness of “your team’s” losses?
Advertisements
Are you convinced that, after all the months of constant foofooraw leading up to “Election Day,” anything substantial really changed between Monday and Wednesday?
It didn’t. We’ve still got the same problems we had before. We’ve still got the same people (minus a few old faces and plus a few new) who will spend the next two years promising to solve those problems. They’ll solve those problems if we’ll all just vote harder … next time.
The most important election ever? Pfft…
The same people telling us that this is the most important election ever said the same about the previous election. It’ll never end because they will say it again about the next election.
Those of us who believe that voting harder will solve our problems will find reasons why voting harder didn’t work this time.
Their team lost its Senate majority or didn’t gain one. The House changed majority parties or didn’t. The dog ate their ballots. There was spit on that baseball or lead in that bat.
Believe it or not, life will go on next week the same way it did last week.
Which, I guess, is better than the alternative.
I’ve worked full-time in politics for more than two decades and part-time for more than three. I can summarize what I’ve learned in six words:
There’s nothing new under the sun.
The issues we tussle over may change in detail, but they don’t change in essence. Voting harder answers the question “who do we let run our lives?” We should instead be asking, “Why let anyone run our lives?”
I follow (and occasionally practice) politics for the same reason a junkie seeks the next fix or a compulsive gambler places just one more bet, not because I expect voting harder to change my life for the better. It’s a nasty habit and I really should quit. But the dog ate my ballot.
Thomas L. Knapp is the director and senior news analyst for the Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism. Knapp is a journalism veteran of over 35 years and a full-time libertarian writer, editor and publisher since 2000.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
play_arrow
play_arrow
play_arrow
play_arrow
Columnists
KNAPP: Things always change with Election Day
todayNovember 5, 2022 29
“Election Day” has become a fuzzy concept lately. Officially it falls on “the Tuesday next after the first Monday in the month of November.” However, most states offer early voting in person or by mail these days.
Millions of Americans have already cast their votes. The probability that we won’t know all the winners and losers on “election night” is in the neighborhood of 100%. The U.S. Senate race in Georgia may well go to a runoff. Some Congressional races may come out close enough to justify a recount. In other races, prospective sore losers have already announced their intention to litigate any result they don’t like.
Even though I’m writing this on the Saturday before “Election Day,” there’s a good chance you won’t see it until Wednesday or later. So now feels like as good a time as any for the “morning after” column.
So, how was it for you? Are you basking in the afterglow of “your team’s” victories, or venting loudly about the unfairness of “your team’s” losses?
Are you convinced that, after all the months of constant foofooraw leading up to “Election Day,” anything substantial really changed between Monday and Wednesday?
It didn’t. We’ve still got the same problems we had before. We’ve still got the same people (minus a few old faces and plus a few new) who will spend the next two years promising to solve those problems. They’ll solve those problems if we’ll all just vote harder … next time.
The most important election ever? Pfft…
The same people telling us that this is the most important election ever said the same about the previous election. It’ll never end because they will say it again about the next election.
Those of us who believe that voting harder will solve our problems will find reasons why voting harder didn’t work this time.
Their team lost its Senate majority or didn’t gain one. The House changed majority parties or didn’t. The dog ate their ballots. There was spit on that baseball or lead in that bat.
Believe it or not, life will go on next week the same way it did last week.
Which, I guess, is better than the alternative.
I’ve worked full-time in politics for more than two decades and part-time for more than three. I can summarize what I’ve learned in six words:
There’s nothing new under the sun.
The issues we tussle over may change in detail, but they don’t change in essence. Voting harder answers the question “who do we let run our lives?” We should instead be asking, “Why let anyone run our lives?”
I follow (and occasionally practice) politics for the same reason a junkie seeks the next fix or a compulsive gambler places just one more bet, not because I expect voting harder to change my life for the better. It’s a nasty habit and I really should quit. But the dog ate my ballot.
What’s your excuse?
Thomas Knapp
Thomas L. Knapp is the director and senior news analyst for the Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism. Knapp is a journalism veteran of over 35 years and a full-time libertarian writer, editor and publisher since 2000.
Knapp has been the publisher of Rational Review News Digest since 2003 and a former columnist for Antiwar.com.
Written by: Thomas Knapp
Similar posts
Editorial
EDITORIAL: Journalism has no home for gatekeeping in 2025
todayJune 22, 2025 42
Letters To The Editor
LETTERS: March 31, 2025
todayMarch 30, 2025 73
Post comments (0)
Libertarian Talk
Free Talk Live
6:00 pm - 9:00 pm
Christian Music Variety
Auto DJ
12:00 am - 9:00 pm