KNAPP: Things always change with Election Day
“Election Day” has become a fuzzy concept lately. Officially it falls on “the Tuesday next after the first Monday in the month of November.” However, most states offer early voting in person or by mail these days.
Millions of Americans have already cast their votes. The probability that we won’t know all the winners and losers on “election night” is in the neighborhood of 100%. The U.S. Senate race in Georgia may well go to a runoff. Some Congressional races may come out close enough to justify a recount. In other races, prospective sore losers have already announced their intention to litigate any result they don’t like.
Even though I’m writing this on the Saturday before “Election Day,” there’s a good chance you won’t see it until Wednesday or later. So now feels like as good a time as any for the “morning after” column.
So, how was it for you? Are you basking in the afterglow of “your team’s” victories, or venting loudly about the unfairness of “your team’s” losses?
Are you convinced that, after all the months of constant foofooraw leading up to “Election Day,” anything substantial really changed between Monday and Wednesday?
It didn’t. We’ve still got the same problems we had before. We’ve still got the same people (minus a few old faces and plus a few new) who will spend the next two years promising to solve those problems. They’ll solve those problems if we’ll all just vote harder … next time.
The most important election ever? Pfft…
The same people telling us that this is the most important election ever said the same about the previous election. It’ll never end because they will say it again about the next election.
Those of us who believe that voting harder will solve our problems will find reasons why voting harder didn’t work this time.
Their team lost its Senate majority or didn’t gain one. The House changed majority parties or didn’t. The dog ate their ballots. There was spit on that baseball or lead in that bat.
Believe it or not, life will go on next week the same way it did last week.
Which, I guess, is better than the alternative.
I’ve worked full-time in politics for more than two decades and part-time for more than three. I can summarize what I’ve learned in six words:
There’s nothing new under the sun.
The issues we tussle over may change in detail, but they don’t change in essence. Voting harder answers the question “who do we let run our lives?” We should instead be asking, “Why let anyone run our lives?”
I follow (and occasionally practice) politics for the same reason a junkie seeks the next fix or a compulsive gambler places just one more bet, not because I expect voting harder to change my life for the better. It’s a nasty habit and I really should quit. But the dog ate my ballot.
What’s your excuse?
Thomas L. Knapp is the director and senior news analyst for the Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism. Knapp is a journalism veteran of over 35 years and a full-time libertarian writer, editor and publisher since 2000.
Knapp has been the publisher of Rational Review News Digest since 2003 and a former columnist for Antiwar.com.
Discussion about this post