KNAPP: “Second wave” of COVID-19 or not, no more lockdowns


Here we go again: Fear of a “second wave” of COVID-19 infections is on a world tour. Naturally, the same “experts” who demanded a global lockdown in response to the “first wave” are saddling up for an encore. Their logic, faulty the first time around, is even more so the second.

We shouldn’t, even for a moment, set aside the hideous and lethal immorality of placing hundreds of millions of human beings under de facto house arrest without accusing, let alone convicting, them of any crime whatsoever. Not to mention forcibly grinding much of the economic activity that keeps 8 billion humans alive to a halt. Those were evil and stupid ideas. But at least there was an excuse, however flimsy, to justify the evil and the stupidity.


Excuses, excuses: The “need” to “flatten the curve” COVID-19 infection

That excuse was a supposed need to “flatten the curve” of infection —  to temporarily slow down the rate of new cases so that hospitals could get enough ICU beds and ventilators in place to handle the caseload.

Mission presumably accomplished, and then some. In much of the world, the COVID-19 caseload hasn’t come close to taxing bed or ventilator availability; and in places where it did, the virus began to slow down as those availabilities began to catch up.

COVID-19 may never leave, but liberty has been sacrificed

COVID-19 isn’t gone and never will be, but our sacrifices of liberty theoretically bought us time. This, in turn, bought us the ability to treat more patients more successfully while we wait for herd immunity, mutations toward weaker strains, or even a vaccine to turn the disease into a rare and/or minor ailment instead of a plague.

Unfortunately the “experts” — or at least the newly empowered and increasingly authoritarian politicians they work for —  are moving the goalposts, threatening a return to “lockdown” any time they decide they’re seeing “too many” cases of COVID-19.


The first lockdown should have never happened

The answer to the first lockdown orders should have been a firm,  non-negotiable, universal “no;” we each knew (and still know) our own isolation and distancing needs far better than any politician or “expert”.

Instead, we gave the politicians the proverbial inch; they took the inevitable mile. They only gave back a bit of it when they realized we were going to take it back, whether they liked it or not.

Now they’re looking for excuses to make us run a marathon with them. And again, the answer we should be giving them is “no.”

Thomas L. Knapp is the director and senior news analyst for the Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism. Knapp is a journalism veteran of over 35 years and a full-time libertarian writer, editor and publisher since 2000. Knapp has been the publisher of Rational Review News Digest since 2003 and a former columnist for Antiwar.com.

more recommended stories

Heartland Newsfeed - Some Rights Reserved 2017-2020. Content published by Heartland Newsfeed staff is covered by the BipCot NoGov license. This allows use and re-use by anyone except governments and government agents. License on record