Chase Oliver earned 2.1% of the vote in Georgia’s U.S. Senate race. Supporters of Herschel Walker and Sen. Raphael Warnock call Oliver a spoiler because he forced the election to a December 6 runoff election. Credit: BRIAN CAHN/ZUMAPRESS/NEWSCOM PHOTO
Here we go again. Yet another “third party” candidate has “spoiled” “major party” candidates’ victory party plans by “stealing” votes that rightfully belong to … well, someone else.
Libertarian Chase Oliver garnered a little more than 2% of the vote in Georgia’s U.S. Senate race. His efforts prevented either incumbent Democrat Raphael Warnock or Republican challenger Herschel Walker from winning the election with a majority. Georgia’s election laws require such a majority. Now the election goes to a Warnock-Walker runoff.
That’s how democracy works, at least in Georgia. And every time a “major party” candidate loses an election or is forced into a runoff by a Libertarian, Green, or other third party or independent candidate, a festival of tears and butt-hurt ensues.
This spoiler argument is not only a “problem” for those who believe that votes inherently “belong” to one of the two “major” parties. Their candidates perpetuate the lie that those pesky third-party and independent contenders are “stealing” votes from one or the other.
Votes don’t belong to parties or candidates. They belong to voters.
Georgia’s voters didn’t (and don’t) owe their votes to Raphael Warnock or Herschel Walker. It’s a candidate’s job to EARN those votes, and one in 50 decided, for whatever reason, that they hadn’t done so and Chase Oliver had.
The spoiler argument doesn’t work when the system is rotten
To the extent that “spoiling” is a “problem,” there’s an easy solution — a solution that Mr. Oliver himself supports. That solution is Ranked Choice Voting.
If Georgia used RCV, voters would have been able to choose more than one candidate: A first choice, a second choice, and so on.
If no candidate had received a majority of first-choice votes, the second-choice votes of the candidate with the fewest first-choice votes would have been automatically added to the other contenders’ totals, until someone received a majority — an “instant runoff” instead of yet another (expensive to both campaigns and taxpayers) campaign cycle.
Why do Republicans and Democrats hate Ranked Choice Voting?
Because even if it didn’t cost them many elections, they’d be embarrassed by the public revelation. Far more than 2% of voters prefer alternatives to fear-based voting for “lesser evil” major party players.
Our “two-party system” is built on the lie that two parties can and do represent all of us. And the “major party” liars, as liars will do, attempt to shift blame to the “spoilers” who expose them.
As Oliver tells ReasonMagazine, “you can’t spoil what’s already rotten.”
Thomas L. Knapp is the director and senior news analyst for the Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism. Knapp is a journalism veteran of over 35 years and a full-time libertarian writer, editor and publisher since 2000.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Columnists
KNAPP: Time for the spoiler whining
todayNovember 14, 2022 100
Here we go again. Yet another “third party” candidate has “spoiled” “major party” candidates’ victory party plans by “stealing” votes that rightfully belong to … well, someone else.
Libertarian Chase Oliver garnered a little more than 2% of the vote in Georgia’s U.S. Senate race. His efforts prevented either incumbent Democrat Raphael Warnock or Republican challenger Herschel Walker from winning the election with a majority. Georgia’s election laws require such a majority. Now the election goes to a Warnock-Walker runoff.
That’s how democracy works, at least in Georgia. And every time a “major party” candidate loses an election or is forced into a runoff by a Libertarian, Green, or other third party or independent candidate, a festival of tears and butt-hurt ensues.
This spoiler argument is not only a “problem” for those who believe that votes inherently “belong” to one of the two “major” parties. Their candidates perpetuate the lie that those pesky third-party and independent contenders are “stealing” votes from one or the other.
Votes don’t belong to parties or candidates. They belong to voters.
Georgia’s voters didn’t (and don’t) owe their votes to Raphael Warnock or Herschel Walker. It’s a candidate’s job to EARN those votes, and one in 50 decided, for whatever reason, that they hadn’t done so and Chase Oliver had.
The spoiler argument doesn’t work when the system is rotten
To the extent that “spoiling” is a “problem,” there’s an easy solution — a solution that Mr. Oliver himself supports. That solution is Ranked Choice Voting.
If Georgia used RCV, voters would have been able to choose more than one candidate: A first choice, a second choice, and so on.
If no candidate had received a majority of first-choice votes, the second-choice votes of the candidate with the fewest first-choice votes would have been automatically added to the other contenders’ totals, until someone received a majority — an “instant runoff” instead of yet another (expensive to both campaigns and taxpayers) campaign cycle.
Why do Republicans and Democrats hate Ranked Choice Voting?
Because even if it didn’t cost them many elections, they’d be embarrassed by the public revelation. Far more than 2% of voters prefer alternatives to fear-based voting for “lesser evil” major party players.
Our “two-party system” is built on the lie that two parties can and do represent all of us. And the “major party” liars, as liars will do, attempt to shift blame to the “spoilers” who expose them.
As Oliver tells Reason Magazine, “you can’t spoil what’s already rotten.”
Thomas Knapp
Thomas L. Knapp is the director and senior news analyst for the Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism. Knapp is a journalism veteran of over 35 years and a full-time libertarian writer, editor and publisher since 2000.
Knapp has been the publisher of Rational Review News Digest since 2003 and a former columnist for Antiwar.com.
Written by: Thomas Knapp
2022 Georgia U.S. Senate Chase Oliver Decision 2022 Election 2022 Herschel Walker Raphael Warnock
Similar posts
Columnists
Create a saving habit
todayJuly 18, 2026 36
Editorial
EDITORIAL: Hard pass on Nokomis City Council run in 2027
todayJuly 17, 2026 15
Libertarian Talk
Lions of Liberty: Finding Freedom
5:00 am - 6:00 am
Christian Music Variety
Auto DJ
12:00 am - 9:00 pm